Readers of this newsletter know we like to start each issue with a folksy, "What's up, everybody?". But given our theme today, we tweak things to: How's your energy level, everybody?
Back in issue #6, we explored mental health at work, and featured this Tweet from Adam Grant:
Alas, 60-odd issues later, wellbeing and burnout are still massive issues at work. And as we revisit the topic, we're reminded of the tensions from last time around:
📌 On the one hand, treating wellness after the fact -- treating its symptoms once the damage is done -- is better than nothing at all. Even if it seems like the "bandaid" approach Grant is bemoaning in his Tweet👆🏻.
📌 On the other, as we wrote at the time, "calling for 'less work' feels simplistic. How does a profit-maximizing organization just reduce the amount of work, or add more employees for the same amount of it?"
📌 And at base, don't we want to impact wellbeing at the source; by redesigning the way our organizations and our work are fundamentally structured? Does the true solve not lie in a more wholesale reimagining of our work that is more human? And if so, how much leverage does a manager or leader have to impact teams' mental health and burnout?
Lots of tensions, and lots of challenges, but that doesn't mean we simply throw our arms up in surrender. 🤷🏻 To the contrary, there are steps we can take to better understand the problem, and to ease the pain points. This week our 3 Stories are designed to do both:
Story #2 - Two MIT scholars on the cutting edge of work made the case last month for a brand new skill they say is now required of a manager. It's got nothing to do with hiring or operations -- and everything to do with awareness and mental health. We dig into the skill, and poke at whether it's a fair expectation of a leader.
Thanks for reading and exploring with us -- and have a great week!
Aki + Usman
P.S. Our podcast of issue #64, "What is going on at work", is right here.
#1
#Wellness #HumanEnergy #TwoWayOneToOnes
Kathleen Hogan leads human resources for Microsoft, and she minces no words in describing the global, cross-industry scale of burnout and detachment at work:
Hogan diagnoses the scope of our problem, but also offers several concrete steps we can take to improve it:
- Run 1:1's with our teams intentionally, as two-way dialogues. Not just as downloads of work to be executed upon, but as chances to listen, understand - and build trust with - our employees.
- Ensure priorities are clear -- because everyone, at every level, benefits from understanding what is and is not important.
- Model taking time off -- and share the stories of you and others taking time off, and how it helped recharge you.
The first bullet 👆🏻, on running a more intentional 1:1's dovetails squarely with our next Story: a newly defined "essential leadership skill": well-being intelligence.
#2
#Wellness #WQ #Awareness #Vocab
We loved this provocative new claim from professors Thomas Roulet and Kiran Bhati at MIT: that knowing how to assess, understand and support your employees' well-being is now a new required leadership skill. And we love that they frame self-awareness -- awareness of our own well-being -- as the starting point for understanding one's team; and from there, the overall organization. They explain:
This image then shows how self-awareness ladders up into team-level and org-level awareness:
We're all for the end-goal here: an organization full of managers, all self-aware, all modeling that awareness and better practices around wellbeing with their teams. And it's possible that at scale, this might lead to culture change. But we also find ourselves asking: do individual managers -- themselves among the most burned-out segments at work, btw -- have enough leverage to be able to impact material change, especially if there is no will or leadership at the very top of the organization to drive that level of culture shift?
#3
#Wellness #LeadersAreTheLevers #Transformational
Which leadership style, pray tell, had the most positive impact on employees' mental health then? Daisy Grewal, writing in "Scientific American" explains:
Painting a vision for where you're headed; bringing people along and making them feel connected to and a part of that journey; allowing them feel like their individual needs are listened to and matter, along the way. Encouraging creativity.
It turns out, we don't, actually, check our human needs at the door when we get to work (where we spend the majority of our waking hours). Funny then that leaders who figure out how to provide for our basic human needs there, wind up being so good for us. 🙃
Thanks for reading. 🙏🏻